Entrovix AI

AI Essay Writer

Turns an essay question into an arguable thesis, a paragraph-by-paragraph outline and a full draft — with the sources marked for you to find rather than invented.

The question

Paste the exact essay question or title.

Sources are marked, never invented

Where the argument needs evidence, the draft writes [cite: what to find] instead of a reference. Language models produce plausible citations to papers that do not exist, and a fabricated source is the fastest way to fail a paper — so this one refuses to guess and tells you what to go and look up.

It ends by arguing with itself

The last section lists the honest weaknesses in the draft's own argument. That is the part a marker will attack, and knowing it before they do is what turns a draft into your essay rather than something you handed over unread.
Your plan and draft

Paste the question and press Plan and draft.

Why use it

Built to be genuinely useful

A thesis that takes a position

Not a restatement of the title. An arguable claim is the difference between a 2:2 and a first.

Citations marked, never fabricated

Where evidence is needed it writes [cite: what to find]. Invented references are the fastest way to fail.

It argues with its own draft

The final section lists the weaknesses a marker will attack, so you can fix them first.

Outline before prose

You can accept the structure and write it yourself — which is the version you can defend in a viva.

How it works

Three steps

  1. 1

    Paste the exact essay question, and set the type, length, level and referencing style.

  2. 2

    Read the thesis and outline first — if the argument is wrong, fixing it here costs one minute.

  3. 3

    Use the draft as scaffolding: replace each [cite:] marker with a real source and rewrite in your own voice.

Use the outline, rewrite the prose

The most valuable output here is the thesis and the outline, not the draft. A thesis that takes a position — rather than announcing a topic — is the single thing that separates an essay that argues from one that describes, and it is the part students most often get wrong before writing a word.

Submitting the draft as it stands is a bad idea for two separate reasons, and only one of them is about getting caught. Every university treats submitting generated text as your own as misconduct, and the penalties run from a zero on the module to a bar from the examination. Read your institution's policy rather than assuming.

The slower cost is the one nobody warns you about. An essay is where you learn to hold a position for 2,000 words, and a degree keeps testing that skill — in the viva, the closed-book paper, the dissertation. Outsourcing the first three essays leaves you unable to write the fourth, with less time to learn.

Why the citations are blank

Language models produce citations that look perfect and do not exist. The author is plausible, the journal is real, the year is sensible, and the paper was never written. This failure has ended careers and cost lawyers their licences, and it is worse in student work because a marker who checks one reference and finds nothing will check them all.

So this tool refuses to guess. Where the argument needs evidence it writes a marker saying what kind of source to find — a study on X, a statistic for Y — and leaves the finding to you. That is slower than a fabricated reference list and it is the only version that survives a marker with a library account.

Your library's database is the place to fill those gaps, not a search engine. If you cannot find a source for a claim the draft makes, that is a signal about the claim rather than about the search: cut it, or weaken it to something the evidence supports.

What the last section is for

Every draft ends with an honest list of the weaknesses in its own argument — the counter-example it does not address, the claim it asserts without support, the paragraph that describes rather than argues. That section exists because it is exactly what a marker writes in the margin.

Read it before you read the draft. If the weaknesses are fundamental, the outline is wrong and rewriting sentences is wasted work. If they are specific, each one is a paragraph you now know to strengthen, which is a far more useful starting point than a draft that reads as though it is already finished.

A draft that sounds confident is not the same as an argument that holds. The fluency is the trap: generated prose reads smoothly enough that its gaps are hard to see, which is why the gaps are listed for you rather than left to be noticed.

FAQ

Questions people ask

Need a tool like this for your business?

We build internal tools, dashboards and automation that fit how your team works.

See Our Services