Entrovix AI

Essay Planner and Checker

It does not write essays — it reads the draft you wrote and reports the six things a marker notices before they judge a single argument.

Runs in your browser — nothing is uploaded

Your draft

Paste what you have written.

Your file never leaves this device. The whole operation runs in your browser — nothing is uploaded, queued on a server, or deleted later, because nothing was ever sent.

Checks passed

Paste a draft to begin

This checks your writing — it does not write for you

Submitting generated text under your own name is academic misconduct, and a tool that does it is not a study aid. What a marker actually looks at first is structure, evidence and precision, and those are checkable. So that is what this does.
What a marker would notice
  • Has an introduction, body and conclusion

    Fewer than three paragraphs. An essay needs at least an opening, a body and a close.

  • Paragraphs are a workable length

    Paragraph lengths are balanced.

  • Claims are supported by sources

    No citations found. Any claim that is not your own reasoning needs a source.

  • Not weakened by filler words

    No filler words found.

  • Sentences are readable

    Sentence lengths are readable.

  • Voice suits academic writing

    No first-person references.

Why use it

Built to be genuinely useful

Checks, does not write

The words stay yours, which is the only version you can safely put your name to.

Six weighted checks

Structure, paragraph balance, citation density, hedging, sentence length and academic voice.

Reads both citation forms

Parenthetical citations like (Smith, 2019) and numeric ones like [1] are both counted.

Nothing is uploaded

Everything runs in your browser, so unpublished coursework never reaches a server.

How it works

Three steps

  1. 1

    Paste the draft you have written, keeping the blank lines between paragraphs.

  2. 2

    Read the six checks and the figure attached to each one.

  3. 3

    Rewrite the failures in your own words, then paste the revision back.

Why this tool refuses to write the essay

Every Indian university's examination regulations treat submitting someone else's writing as your own as misconduct, and generated text is not exempt. The penalty is rarely a warning: it is a zero on the module, a note on your record, and in a repeat case a bar from the examination itself.

The slower cost is worse. An essay is where you learn to hold a position for 2,000 words, and a degree keeps testing that skill — in the viva, the closed-book paper, the dissertation. Outsourcing the first three essays leaves you unable to write the fourth, with less time to learn.

So this tool starts where a good tutor starts: with your draft. It reads what you have written and reports what a marker would see in the first two minutes, before they read a word for content. Fixing those six things is work you can honestly claim credit for.

What the six checks measure

Structure looks for at least three paragraphs, since an argument needs an opening, a body and a close. Paragraph balance flags any paragraph past 200 words, which usually means two ideas fused together, and more than one under 40 words, which usually means a point you dropped before developing it.

“Claims are supported by sources” expects roughly one citation per 400 words, with a floor of two. A 2,000-word essay therefore needs five before it passes. Both forms are counted: parenthetical ones like (Smith, 2019) and numeric ones like [1], so IEEE and Harvard drafts are read the same way.

The last three read tone. Hedges — very, really, quite, basically, actually — are counted against a budget of one per 200 words. Sentences past 40 words are flagged once they exceed a tenth of the draft. First-person use is flagged only above one occurrence per hundred words, so a single methodological mention of yourself passes.

Reading the result without over-correcting

A failed check is a prompt to look, not an instruction to change. “Voice suits academic writing” fails on first-person density, but a reflective portfolio or a methods chapter is meant to be written in the first person. Your department's guidance beats a threshold every time.

Citation density is the crudest of the six. A literature review may carry three sources a paragraph; a philosophy essay building one sustained argument may honestly need four in total. The count tells you whether you have supported your claims at all — it cannot tell you whether the sources are any good.

Fix in this order: structure first, then paragraph balance, then citations, then tone. Rewriting sentences in a paragraph you are about to split is wasted effort. Paste the revision back when you are done, and the six checks run again on the new text.

FAQ

Questions people ask

Need a tool like this for your business?

We build internal tools, dashboards and automation that fit how your team works.

See Our Services